Saturday, November 10, 2012

Country investment ratings


Country investment ratings


Updated on 2012


Shows the countries where buy-to-let property earns the highest returns. For assumptions see below.
Sort data by clicking on the headers. Mouseover data to see more information.

City/Country Gross Rental Yield
(% per annum)
Long Term Investment Rating
 1 Andorra 2.39% Very Poor 1
 2 Argentina, Buenos Aires 6.52% Moderate to Good 2
 3 Aruba, Makmol and Baval 7.32% Good 2
 4 Australia, Sydney 3.64% Very Poor 2
 5 Austria, Vienna 3.81% Very Poor 2
 6 Bahamas 8.16% Excellent 4
 7 Belgium, Brussels 4.69% Poor 2
 8 Bermuda 4.76% Poor 2
 9 Brazil, Sao Paolo 5.71% Moderate 4
 10 Bulgaria, Sophia 4.19% Poor 2
 11 BVI, Tortola 2.85% Very Poor 3
 12 Cambodia, Phnom Phen 5.33% Moderate 2
 13 Canada, Toronto 3.68% Very Poor 3
 14 Cayman Is., Grand Cayman 7.25% Good 4
 15 Chile, Santiago 8.99% Excellent 4
 16 China, Shanghai 2.66% Very Poor 1
 17 Colombia, Bogota 7.46% Good 5
City/Country Gross Rental Yield
(% per annum)
Long Term Investment Rating
 18 Costa Rica, San Jose 8.38% Excellent 3
 19 Croatia, Zagreb 4.56% Poor 3
 20 Cyprus, Limassol 4.10%
1
 21 Czech Republic, Prague 3.51% Very Poor 2
 22 Denmark, Copenhagen 5.33% Moderate
n.a.
 23 Ecuador, Quito 7.89% Good 3
 24 Egypt, Cairo 6.71% Moderate to Good 5
 25 El Salvador, San Salvador 7.70% Good 3
 26 Estonia, Tallinn 4.24% Poor 3
 27 Finland, Helsinki 4.05% Very Poor 2
 28 France, Paris 2.99% Very Poor 2
 29 Germany, Berlin 4.12% Poor 3
 30 Greece, Athens 3.25% Very Poor 1
 31 Guadeloupe, Grande-Terre 5.15% Moderate 3
 32 Hong Kong, Hong Kong Island 3.11% Very Poor 2
 33 Hungary, Budapest 8.10% Excellent 4
 34 India, Mumbai 2.68% Very Poor 2
City/Country Gross Rental Yield
(% per annum)
Long Term Investment Rating
 35 Indonesia, Jakarta 9.31% Excellent 3
 36 Israel, Tel Aviv 3.84% Very Poor 2
 37 Italy, Rome 4.04% Very Poor 3
 38 Jamaica, Kingston 9.75% Excellent 3
 39 Japan, Tokyo 4.46% Poor 2
 40 Jordan, Amman 9.25% Excellent 5
 41 Kenya, Nairobi 7.18% Good 3
 42 Latvia, Riga 4.11% Poor 3
 43 Lebanon, Beirut 4.65% Poor 2
 44 Lithuania, Vilnius 4.01% Very Poor 2
 45 Luxembourg 3.71% Very Poor 1
 46 Macedonia. Skopje 6.39% Moderate to Good 4
 47 Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 6.21% Moderate to Good 4
 48 Malta, Valleta 3.72% Very Poor 1
 49 Martinique, Fort-de-France 5.12% Moderate 2
 50 Mexico, Mexico City 8.77% Excellent
n.a.
 51 Moldova, Chisinau 10.00% Spectacular 3
City/Country Gross Rental Yield
(% per annum)
Long Term Investment Rating
 52 Monaco 1.64% Very Poor 1
 53 Morocco, Marrakesh 6.09% Moderate to Good 4
 54 Netherlands, Amsterdam 5.11% Moderate 4
 55 New Zealand, Auckland 6.80% Moderate to Good 4
 56 Nicaragua, Managua 7.13% Good 4
 57 Panama, Panama City 9.03% Excellent 5
 58 Peru, Lima 8.17% Excellent 5
 59 Philippines, Metro Manila 8.62% Excellent 3
 60 Poland, Warsaw 4.89% Poor 3
 61 Portugal, Lisbon 5.24% Moderate 2
 62 Puerto Rico, San Juan 5.35% Moderate 2
 63 Romania, Bucharest 5.57% Moderate 3
 64 Russia, Moscow 3.64% Very Poor 2
 65 Serbia 5.93% Moderate 2
 66 Singapore 2.95% Very Poor 2
 67 Slovakia, Bratislava 4.88% Poor 3
 68 Slovenia, Ljubljana 5.15% Moderate 3
City/Country Gross Rental Yield
(% per annum)
Long Term Investment Rating
 69 South Africa, Cape Town 5.77% Moderate 2
 70 Spain, Madrid 3.98% Very Poor 1
 71 St Lucia 3.57% Very Poor 2
 72 St. Kitts 4.90% Poor 1
 73 Switzerland, Geneva 2.94% Very Poor 2
 74 Taiwan, Taipei 1.57% Very Poor 1
 75 Tanzania, Dar es Salaam 8.57% Excellent 2
 76 Thailand, Bangkok 6.53% Moderate to Good 4
 77 Trinidad 6.88% Moderate to Good 3
 78 Turkey, Istanbul 5.22% Moderate 4
 79 UAE, Dubai 6.89% Moderate to Good 2
 80 UK, London 3.43% Very Poor 2
 81 Ukraine, Kiev 9.09% Excellent 2
 82 Uruguay, Montevideo 7.63% Good 5
 83 US, New York 4.70% Poor 3

Our Gross Rental Yield figures are based on the average yields for 120 square metre properties (in most locations - see mouse overs).
- Our Long Term Investment Rating is based on many factors:
  • Gross rental yield
  • Income tax
  • Capital gains tax
  • Round-trip transaction costs
  • Potential landlord and tenant problems
  • Long-term GDP growth
  • Potential over-supply
  • Affordability
  • A view of long-term appeal to investors

No comments:

Post a Comment